Friday, June 26, 2009

Re: [twilightsm_group] Re: Breaking Dawn



Although i agree killing a Cullen would have been an exciting story i think the way she wrote that was perfect. To me this part was like a chess game (cover). Edward (in my opinion) was always ahead of the game because of mind reading. Honestly, if there was death match i really don't think anyone would have survived. Maybe Bella but i don't think so.
 
What i think should have been different was the Jacob / Renesmee part. Not only because it was a little creepy. But it was just too perfect. Bella got it all. I didn't like that idea. I wish that was a bit different.
 
Judy In CT

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 7:42 PM, arely_joana <arely_joana@yahoo.com> wrote:


--- In twilightsm_group@yahoogroups.com, "ericka" <ebmordecai@...> wrote:
>
> ******Breaking Dawn Spoilers********
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> So, I was thinking the other day about Breaking Dawn and I remembered an interview that Stephanie Myers did in response to some of the negative feedback that she recieved from fans about the climax leading up to the war against the Volturi and then the war never happen. She stated that she just couldn't see a way to do a big war without casulties. So my question to you all is, do you like the way Breaking Dawn went or do you really wish that there would have been a big blood bath, even if some of our favorite characters would not have survived it?
>
> Ericka
>

I wish there was a fight. Fights are exciting, excillerating, and you could always put twists in them. Make some die, chicken out, kill Edward. Would have made the book MUCH more entertaining.


__._,_.___
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Give Back

Yahoo! for Good

Get inspired

by a good cause.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment